Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM), ge\u00e7en y\u0131l \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funu Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc (FET\u00d6) mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 30 bin 63 ba\u015fvuruyu reddetti.<\/p>\n
AA muhabirinin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgiye g\u00f6re, A\u0130HM, 2017’de T\u00fcrkiye aleyhine yap\u0131lan toplam 31 bin 54 ba\u015fvuruyu karara ba\u011flad\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130nceleme ve de\u011ferlendirmeler sonras\u0131nda A\u0130HM, T\u00fcrkiye hakk\u0131nda 99 ihlal karar\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Ba\u015fvurulardan 4’\u00fcnde ihlal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit eden A\u0130HM, 7 ba\u015fvurunun d\u00fc\u015fmesine, 6 ba\u015fvuruda ise d\u00fczeltme ve tazminata karar verdi.<\/p>\n
Tamam\u0131na yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131 FET\u00d6 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 30 bin 63 ba\u015fvuruyu kabul edilemez bulan A\u0130HM, s\u00f6z konusu m\u00fcracaatlar\u0131n reddedilmesine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n
FET\u00d6’c\u00fc m\u00fcd\u00fcre ret<\/strong><\/p>\n A\u0130HM taraf\u0131ndan “25 Aral\u0131k darbeye te\u015febb\u00fcs” davas\u0131 san\u0131klar\u0131ndan eski emniyet m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc Yakub Sayg\u0131l\u0131’n\u0131n ba\u015fvurusu kabul edilemez bulundu.<\/p>\n FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin, “takipsizlikle sonu\u00e7lanan 25 Aral\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda usuls\u00fczl\u00fckler yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u015f\u00fcphelilere kumpas kurarak darbeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fi” iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n san\u0131klar\u0131ndan Sayg\u0131l\u0131, 4 Eyl\u00fcl 2014’te tutuklanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bas\u0131nda hakk\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131kan haberlerle ilgili savc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan takipsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesini A\u0130HM’e ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/p>\n Sayg\u0131l\u0131, ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, adil yarg\u0131lanma, \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, etkili hukuk yoluna ba\u015fvurma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n A\u0130HM, \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fikayetle ilgili, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n hukuk mahkemesinde tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7mam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fini belirtti. A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvurucunun ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fikayetlerinin, delillendirilmemesi ve konuyla ilgili herhangi bir belge sunulmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p>\n Yarg\u0131 mercilerince ba\u015fvuran hakk\u0131ndaki bilgilerin bas\u0131na verilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik \u015fikayetleri de de\u011ferlendiren A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n bu konuda herhangi bir belge sunmamas\u0131, resmi makamlar\u0131n ba\u015fvuran\u0131n su\u00e7lu oldu\u011funa dair resmi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 ve bu iddialar\u0131n ulusal makamlar nezdinde dile getirilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n Tecrit karar\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n A\u0130HM, FET\u00d6 tutuklusu eski hakim Ayhan Bora’n\u0131n da cezaevinde tecritte bulunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurusunu da kabul edilemez buldu.<\/p>\n Tutukluluk karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren Bora, cezaevinde tek ki\u015filik h\u00fccreye konularak tecrit edildi\u011fini savundu. Bora, ba\u015fvurusunda, kendisine ihtiyac\u0131 olan ila\u00e7lar\u0131n verilmedi\u011fini, avukat\u0131 ve ailesiyle de g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015femedi\u011fini belirtti.<\/p>\n Tek ki\u015filik odada tutulmas\u0131 nedeniyle tedavisinin sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ne s\u00fcren Bora, i\u015fkence ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek, tedbir karar\u0131 talep etti.<\/p>\n Cezaevi ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’ndeki (A\u0130HS) h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal etmedi\u011fi sonucuna varan A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n fiziki ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n Avrupa Konseyi Bakanlar Komitesi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilen Avrupa Cezaevi Kurallar\u0131’na uygun oldu\u011funu belirledi.<\/p>\n A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n tek ki\u015filik odada kalmas\u0131n\u0131n tecrit amac\u0131yla de\u011fil, at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n ciddiyeti ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011finden yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00fcvenlik gerek\u00e7esiyle oldu\u011funu belirtti.<\/p>\n Tedbir talebini de reddeden A\u0130HM, di\u011fer \u015fikayetlerin ulusal makamlara iletilmemesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulmamas\u0131 nedenleriyle i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fine karar vererek ba\u015fvuruyu reddetti.<\/p>\n \u00d6te yandan A\u0130HM, FET\u00d6 ile ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 Feza Gazetecilik Anonim \u015eirketinin, Zaman gazetesi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na akreditasyon verilmemesine ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurunun d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verdi.<\/p>\n Meslekten ihra\u00e7 edilenlerle ilgili kararlar<\/strong><\/p>\n A\u0130HM, meslekten ihra\u00e7 edilen FET\u00d6 mensuplar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik de emsal niteli\u011finde bir karara imza att\u0131. Mahkeme, ihra\u00e7 edilen \u00f6\u011fretmen G\u00f6khan K\u00f6ksal’\u0131n mesle\u011fe iadesini talep etti\u011fi ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti.<\/p>\n Meslekten ihra\u00e7 edilenlerin ba\u015fvurular\u0131nda Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal (OHAL) \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonunu adres g\u00f6steren A\u0130HM’in, ret kararlar\u0131 verdikleri aras\u0131nda bu y\u00f6nde yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular da bulundu.<\/p>\n A\u0130HM’in, ge\u00e7en y\u0131l verdi\u011fi kararlar aras\u0131nda CHP’nin 16 Nisan 2017’de yap\u0131lan anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine ili\u015fkin halk oylamas\u0131yla ilgili ba\u015fvurusu da yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n Mahkeme, oylaman\u0131n iptaline y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvuruyu, referandum konusunun Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (A\u0130HS) \u00e7er\u00e7evesine girmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetti.<\/p>\n Kabul edilemez bulunarak reddedilen ba\u015fka bir ba\u015fvuru da ba\u015f\u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc \u00f6\u011frencilerin e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131 engelledi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan Prof. Dr. Esat Rennan Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc’n\u00fcn ba\u015fvurusu oldu. A\u0130HM, Pek\u00fcnl\u00fc hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcnde, ba\u015f\u00f6rt\u00fcl\u00fc olarak \u00fcniversiteye girmenin yasak oldu\u011fu durumda bile bu konudaki karar\u0131n ba\u015fvuran\u0131n yetkisini a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulad\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi’nin (A\u0130HM), ge\u00e7en y\u0131l ret karar\u0131 verdi\u011fi 30 bin 63 ba\u015fvurunun \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funu FET\u00d6 mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcracaatlar olu\u015fturdu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7656,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-71171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-avrupa"],"yoast_head":"\n